Cobblestone Vs. Brick

Cobblestones

• Cobblestones have been used as paving material for centuries. Historically, these are rounded stones gathered from streams and riverbeds, while contemporary cobblestones are often granite that has been quarried, cut and shaped to the correct size for paving, typically 6 to 12 inches square. Smaller cobbles have a more traditional look, while larger stones provide a more even surface. Stones are available in a range of colors, as well.

Brick Pavers

• Pavers made from fired clay bricks are nearly as durable as cobblestones. Brick pavers can be set with mortar or loose on a bed of sand. Pavers set without mortar are held in place by loose sand packed between them. Brick pavers can be new or used. Reclaimed bricks give the surface an instantly weathered and established look.

Advantages

• Both cobblestones and brick pavers have advantages over solid surface paving such as concrete or asphalt, including better drainage and superior durability. In the event of damage, individual pavers can be replaced without the necessity of disturbing the rest of the surface. Cobblestones are extremely durable and provide a sophisticated, traditional look. Brick pavers are less expensive than cobblestones but are still more durable than concrete pavers or other synthetic paving options. Installation of bricks is relatively easy and can be done by most homeowners.

Disadvantages

• Cobblestones have several distinct disadvantages. They tend to create an uneven surface that can be hazardous and uncomfortable to walk on. Because of this uneven surface, cobblestones are not recommended for large areas of paving, and because the surface can make snow removal difficult, cobbles are not a good choice for walkways in cold climates. Cobbles are also considerably more expensive than other paving options. Brick pavers are less expensive than cobbles, but they are also less durable. They can also be subject to shifting and instability, and weeds can grow between the pavers.